Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

13 February 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< February 12	February 14 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

ButterflyMX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability (no improv. since 2021). Also see that single stride from Special:Contributions/24.218.220.54, related to the same business/person, all edits served no purpose other than linking to this company. wikimpan (Talk) 11:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Companies. wikimpan (Talk) 11:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Patanjali Wellness

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references in the article currently consist of routine coverage (WP:ROUTINE), which is typically found in Indian media (WP:NEWSORGINDIA). Apart from that, the article entirely fails to meet the WP:NCORP guidelines. Baqi:) (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and India. Baqi:) (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Companies, Medicine, and Uttarakhand. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The company is backed with multiple reliable sources meets WP:SIGCOV and thus passes WP:NCORP. GregLoo (talk) 09:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS Link

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources, making it fail to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Loewstisch (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Loewstisch (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, Czech Republic, Luxembourg, and Slovakia. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 10:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Did OP look? Loads of local-language coverage as you might expect, such as Czech Radio [1] [2], Mafra [3] [4], Czech Television [5] [6]. C 679 14:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Conologue, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an early post office back-added to the topos from an old map. Need more evidence that that of an actual settlement as these maps recorded post offices as well as actual towns. Mangoe (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 03:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Baker (p.101) says that this was a post office, and warns that we might have to search for Conlogue. So I did. The printed 1980s version of the GNIS database records this as "Conologue Post Office", which is a bit of a clue in itself. I found Conlogue in Jackson in an 1869 government listing of post offices.
But those of you fresh from the discussion of Fleming, Indiana (AfD discussion) will enjoy what I found after that, which was Conlogue in a table on p.65 of the 1876 Monitor Guide to Post Offices and Railroad Stations in the United States and Canada which says "(R.R. name, Fleming's)". So this is the earlier name for the post office by Fleming's station on the O&M.
But other than the shipping guides and post office directories: I found nothing.
Uncle G (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both Conologue and Fleming. Thanks for your effort, Uncle G, and if we have to do this much digging to find whether a place actually existed, and there is still uncertainty, then we don't have enough info for an article. Essentially a WP:V fail. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It meets WP:GEOLAND: a quick search of Newspapers.com shows that it had a school up to at least 1947, a cemetery, and a church in the 1960s and 1970s. There were still burials at Conologue Cemetery up to 2021. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, then where is it? The church is not at the location that GNIS gives for the "populated place", and looking at where the church was on the topos (and there is a building at that location appearing in the aerials up to 1960; it disappears before the next one in 1983), it sits in isolation; there's no town there. Unless the news clip says, there's no indication where the school was, and in any case neither schools nor churches require towns to exist. Again, it's a familiar issue: without direct evidence of a town from people talking about it as such, there's nothing inconsistent with this being a locale with no distinct village/town. Mangoe (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - This article from 1986 [7] explains where Conologue school house, church and cemetery were (are, in the case of the cemetery). Looking at the sources again, I find none that describe Conologue as a town or village - at most they say "Conologue community". They all say things like "Conologue school, Redding township". I am now !voting to Merge this article (and the Fleming one) to Redding Township, Jackson County, Indiana - and editing that to list Unincorporated Communities (like Conologue) or to list schools, churches, etc (there are plenty of newspaper articles that do just that - eg, they published scores for each school in Jackson County, by township). There are sources which can be included in the Redding article to provide information about its facilities over time. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm going to add other sources here, so they are available to add either to this article, if kept, or to Redding Township, Jackson County, Indiana. A 1963 report of a fire refers to "the old Conologue school" [8]. Sisters Eva and Phoebe Brooks Quinn reminisce in 1990 about Fleming and Conologue [9]. School attendance records in Jackson county, 1932, part 1 [10] and part 2 [11]. 100 year old Lydia Nichter tells kindergarten students about Conologue school etc [12]. Schools in Jackson county listed by townships (Redding and Carr) and scored, part 1 [13] and part 2 [14]. Jackson County Fair display about old schools, 1995, part 1 [15] and end of article [16].
    - I strongly disagree with an "unincorporated community" list in the township, simply because these aren't unincorporated communities. That's just sweeping the mess elsewhere. Yes, listing schools and churches is the way to go; and in other states this is what the (19th century) sources themselves do, too. In Kansas, for example, the government reports have lists of schools and churches in the Board of Agriculture annual reports (Biennial report — Kansas State Board of Agriculture at the HathiTrust Digital Library) for each individual county. The real question is whether Indiana naturally breaks down by county or by township as far as sourcing is concerned. Uncle G (talk) 11:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Is there a source that names unincorporated communities in Indiana? Conologue and other places like it seem to meet the definition of unincorporated community given in Unincorporated area#United States. 1920s papers (eg Jackson County Banner and The Tribune (Seymour, Indiana)) published social information for communities like Conologue, Spraytown, Indiana, and others with hard-to-search names like Oak Grove, Pleasant Ridge, etc - examples from 1926 here [17] and here [18]. Here's a notice to Conologue Community in 1928 [19]. People are described as "of Conologue" as late as 1956 [20]. This is not at all my area of expertise, and I'm not going to put more time into it. It may need someone to write more histories or directories of whatever these places are/were. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus here yet and new sources brought into the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 09:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fleming, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing evidence that this was more than a short-lived post office at a rail point. Mangoe (talk) 03:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 03:12, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Especially as Baker says (p.133) outright that it was a railway station that later gained a post office. ☺ After no success with a lot of histories and gazetteers, I finally located this as Fleming's in a table on page 80 of W. F. Allen's 1874 Gazetteer of Railway Stations in the United States and the Dominion of Canada. It was on the Ohio & Mississippi. That source says that the station served a population of 200, but makes no statement about what form that population took. Fleming's is in the station listing for the O&M in James Macfarlane's 1890 An American Geological Railway Guide too. The post office is in the 1899 USPS directory. But no Lippincott's nor the Thomas gazetteer has a Fleming or Fleming's, out of the several that they do have, in Indiana. Uncle G (talk) 08:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, does not appear to meet WP:GEOLAND. The only result I have found so far in Newspapers.com is this [21] from 1975, about a road crossing a railroad "at or near Fleming, Spencer-Redding Township", that two farmers used to get to their farms. It's not easy to search, as Fleming is a common surname, and there was a school in Duckcreek township called Fleming School five miles north and one mile east of Elwood, Indiana - but unlike Conologue, Indiana, it does not have lots of mentions as an inhabited place. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 09:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bobtown, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This book's explanation of the name's origin for a place in Clay County strikes me as a bit of a "just so" story, but it's about all I get besides Baker. I'm just not finding a trace of the place searching and there's nothing there which suggests it was really a town. @Uncle G:? Mangoe (talk) 13:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:22, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The interesting thing is reading Baker, p. 71. Baker tells us that xe can only guess at what this is because it doesn't appear any maps that xe has consulted. It's like reading a deletion nomination rationale straight out of the source. ☺
Wanting to be thorough, although one could just leave it at that, I did some looking. There's a biography of John Mellencamp (ISBN 9780857128430) that says that this was the original working title of The Lonesome Jubilee because Mellencanp's grandparents "once lived there".
Other than that, though, I have turned up nothing. There are some soil surveys that name a soil type after this, but they aren't documenting the (supposed) town. The gazetteers only turn up the place in Massachusetts. I couldn't even construct more than a vague opening sentence of an article, with zero hope for expansion or clarification, because even the biography only narrows it down to Jackson County, and is only indirectly reporting the existence of the place based upon Mellencanp's recollection of how xe named a music album. For a place, I'd prefer a geographer to a biographer.
Uncle G (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I added a 2015 local newspaper article source, as well as a Billboard magazine cite about the Mellencamp connection. The property owner name Mellencamp appears right near the location on some plat maps. eg [22]; though not listed as "Bobtown" on that one, you can see where the school was located, and there are a bunch of smaller plots centered at the location. It was/is an unincorporated community which has receded into remembrance, like so many U.S. midwestern locales.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 22:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding: there are 101 hits for "Bobtown" in the archives of the Seymour Daily Republican (1898-1920), on internet archive [23]. Mostly mundane reporting of what's happening in the community. But more than enough to show it was a recognized populated community.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 22:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - Checking out a random sampling of the Daily Republican and finding random things like reports of football teams with "CORTLAND" as the headline, and "Lawrence Phegley sold a cow" without any sort of clue about a Bobtown, this seems to be another case of counting the number of hits rather than reading the sources. I challenge you to find just two of those newspaper hits that actually tell you what Bobtown is, the basic "Bobtown is a …" introduction part of an article. Should be easy, right, with 101 of them? So prove it. And as you note, Billboard is Mellencamp's recollection, as I discussed above. That map that doesn't say Bobtown at all is a contraindication, if anything, and yet more support for Baker saying that this isn't on any maps at all. The only real source is Spicer, which you've mis-cited by the way, but which doesn't say vital things like that it was a town, or a village, or even a hamlet. There's a one-room rural school and grocery story run by a Bob that apparently gave rise to a nickname. Uncle G (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I said the daily republican hits were "mundane", you're telling me to prove they aren't mundane? is this a trick? Don't let your obvious hate of the work of John Cougar Mellencamp cloud your opinion of the once beautiful small rural Indiana community which went by the name of Bobtown. There are USGS maps which list Bobtown on them, by the way e.g. bottom third center here [24]. Seriously though, I understand your view of notability of such places like this varies from mine, and that's ok.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 09:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Buddha International Cricket Stadium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks Notability. Redirect removed without significant development supported by independent reliable sources . Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify – WP:TOOSOON, but there is something about the construction [25], [26], [27]. Svartner (talk) 10:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmazz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No single sources meets NCORP; routine not reliable and deep media sources; not notable company by its own Taking off shortly (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Medicine, India, United Kingdom, and Illinois. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 10:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TravelPerk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotinal routine coverage sources only about seed fund raising and similar event-based news. Not meeting NCORP Taking off shortly (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Travel and tourism, Germany, Spain, England, Florida, Illinois, and Massachusetts. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 11:03, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laurence Westgaph

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

UK television presenter and PhD student with some academic activity. The best sign of notability appears to be various allegations of sexual misconduct over time [28], more recently [29] [30]. I am not seeing much sign of NPROF, and am not certain that the sourcing meets WP:BLPCRIME -- the Telegraph describes him as a "high profile historian", but I am not seeing so much of the kind of evidence of impact that we generally look for. There are a lot of tabloid sources that we cannot use. I am a weak delete here, and am bringing this to AfD to get clarity on notability before expending effort on bringing the article into shape. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Tattwamayananda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE shows no coverage in reliable, independent sources. Fails GNG. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Spirituality, and California. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:BLP. The formatting makes no sense to me, nor even the title. The sourcing is far below what we expect from a biographical article of a person living in North America. Bearian (talk) 12:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bearian,

I’ve gone ahead and made the necessary changes as discussed. I’ve worked to address the concerns, and I hope everything aligns with your expectations now. Please take a look and let me know if any further adjustments are needed!

Please appove it.

Thanks,

Shashi. Shashi Boinapalli (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeraxmoira,

I’ve gone ahead and made the necessary changes as discussed. I’ve worked to address the concerns, and I hope everything aligns with your expectations now. Please take a look and let me know if any further adjustments are needed!

Please approve it.

Thanks,

Shashi. Shashi Boinapalli (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: With an unbolded Keep opinion here, this can't be closed as Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rohini Acharya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject was not elected in the election and she belongs to a political family of Bihar but the notability is not inherited. The subject fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Taabii (talk) 08:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Women, India, and Bihar. Taabii (talk) 08:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tusayiwe Mkhondya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article subject may lack the required notability. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 07:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment Well it may, but I'd be surprised, the article has been patrolled, it has multiple reliable sources over several years, detailed accounts that are both national and international, well sourced photos of both her and her creations.... and that is assuming we ignore the additional stuff on youtube etc. All of that together defines notability for me. Victuallers (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 07:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - all but (3) Voice of America are less than reliable. (1) Newsweek has gotten such a weak reputation that it has its own nickname; (2) Malawi's nation is unknown to me; (4) Metro UK is on the list of unreliable sources; (5) and (6) are unknown; and (7) is basically a press release from a company that provided charity. If you find better sources, please ping me. Bearian (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was surprised by Bearian's findings (as was s/he). I have removed the references to the unreliable sources of Newsweek and Metro and what remains is still independent coverage from different sources over time. cheers Victuallers (talk) 14:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per Victuallers, enough coverage FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel Edgal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and all the sources cannot establish WP:SIGCOV. Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. Ibjaja055 (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsing WALLOFTEXT LLM !vote

Keep Gabriel Edgal – Meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV

I believe the article Gabriel Edgal meets Wikipedia’s General Notability Guidelines (WP:GNG) and Significant Coverage (WP:SIGCOV) standards based on the following points:
	1.	Substantial Leadership & Notability in African Banking
	•	Gabriel Edgal has held executive leadership roles in major financial institutions across Africa, including:
	•	CEO of Oakwood Green Africa, a financial and trade advisory firm.
	•	Promoter of Bloom Bank Africa, a banking group with operations in Gambia, Sierra Leone, and Liberia.
	•	Former CEO of First Atlantic Bank Ghana (2013–2016).
	•	Former Africa CEO for United Bank for Africa (UBA), overseeing 18 African countries.
	•	His leadership across multiple financial institutions aligns with WP:ANYBIO, which recognizes significant figures in business and finance.
	2.	Independent, Reliable Media Coverage (Meets WP:SIGCOV)
	•	Gabriel Edgal has been featured in multiple independent news articles, discussing his impact on banking, digital finance, and trade facilitation in Africa.
	•	Here are key references demonstrating substantial coverage in independent sources:

[https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/business/African-youth-must-play-a-central-role-in-building-the-continent-Gabriel-Edgal-1937399 Ghana Web: African youth must play a central role in building the continent – Gabriel Edgal]

[https://ghanaiantimes.com.gh/mansa-papss-digital-platforms-to-facilitate-trade-boost-economic-development-mr-gabriel-edgal/ Ghanaian Times: Mansa PAPSS digital platforms to facilitate trade, boost economic development – Gabriel Edgal]

[https://dailyguidenetwork.com/mansa-platform-papss-to-boost-trade/ Daily Guide Network: Mansa Platform & PAPSS to Boost Trade]

[https://www.modernghana.com/news/656855/first-atlantic-bank-ceo-gabriel-edgal-woos-investors.html Modern Ghana: First Atlantic Bank CEO Gabriel Edgal Woos Investors]

[https://gna.org.gh/2023/06/digital-payment-systems-can-ease-currency-depreciation-oakwood-green-ceo/ Ghana News Agency: Digital payment systems can ease currency depreciation – Oakwood Green CEO]

[https://thecalabashnewspaper.com/afreximbank-oakwood-green-africa-engage-the-press/ The Calabash Newspaper: Afreximbank & Oakwood Green Africa engage the press]

[https://www.afreximbank.com/feda-invests-in-bloom-africa-holdings-limited-to-support-its-expansion-in-west-africa/ Afreximbank: FEDA invests in Bloom Africa Holdings to support expansion]

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZFfAxUgoF0 Gabriel Edgal on Financial Markets (YouTube)]

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZL78wJyPiw Trade Finance & Economic Policies (YouTube)]

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3TTrrHZJEk Afreximbank Discussion (YouTube)]

	•	These sources provide substantial coverage beyond routine announcements, focusing on his impact in trade finance and banking innovation.

	3.	Comparable Wikipedia Articles Exist

	•	Gabriel Edgal’s notability and media coverage are similar to other African banking executives who have Wikipedia pages, such as:
	•	Daniel Wilson Addo – CEO of Consolidated Bank Ghana. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Wilson_Addo Daniel Wilson Addo]
	•	Given his equal or greater recognition and media coverage, his article aligns with precedent cases for business leaders.

	4.	Alternative to Deletion – Consider Draftification

	•	If concerns remain regarding WP:SIGCOV, I propose moving the article to Draft space instead of deletion.
	•	This will allow further improvements, sourcing, and verification rather than outright removal.

Gabriel Edgal is a highly notable figure in African banking with independent media coverage that meets Wikipedia’s notability standards. Instead of deletion, I suggest retaining or draftifying the article while improving references.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Towncrier99 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use LLMs to write rationales. Uncle G (talk) 11:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not appear to have any valid secondary sourcing to prove WP:GNG. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 00:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Soft keep - Article would need a WP:HEY improvement to get a hard keep from me. I disagree with the nom regarding notability and significant coverage. There are plenty of WP:RS in news and books covering the subject. The issue I have is the lack of refs in many of the headings/claims, and the WP:REFBOMB in the "Pan-African advocacy" section which was initially a concern for me until I did WP:BEFORE. YouTube is also questionable as a ref. Where appropriate, they should be in External links.Tamsier (talk) 03:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean "Weak Keep" here. There is a delete option called a "Soft Deletion" but I've never heard of a "Soft Keep" before. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arfaz Ayub

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesnot pass WP:NFILMMAKER, WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. Taabii (talk) 08:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. Taabii (talk) 08:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:DIRECTOR as director of Level Cross (film) -Mushy Yank. 09:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yokoji Zen Mountain Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be WP:PROMO The majority of the page sounds like an advertisement, not to mention, it's notability has been questioned since 2010. The article hasn't changed much since, so I will also say it is WP:GNG.

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kofi Owusu-Nhyira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable lawyer and entrepreneur. The sources in the article and a WP: Before could not establish notability. Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Ghana. Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe subject is notable has received significant coverage in third party sources. Owula kpakpo (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is an unbolded Keep here from the article creator so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adam B. Sefkow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Assistant professor who works on team projects in high-energy physics with no major awards, WP:TOOSOON. Page was Prodded since his h-factor of 35 is small for the field, particularly as almost all of his publications have 5-32 coauthors. PROD was opposed by Espresso Addict with the argument that 35 is enough to possibly pass WP:NPROF#C1, it appears unaware of the consensus that h-factors have to be field normalized. As has previously been discussed at WT:NPROF, an h-factor of 35 is very notable in math; a good start in solid-state physics and low for high-energy physics. There is also the need to consider the number of authors, de-emphasizing large team citations such as he has been involved in. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Science. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Not unaware of any of that, just unkeen to set a trend of uncontested prods of academics with that kind of citation profile. I don't pay much attention to the h-index, more to the total citations and the citations of the top papers. Here both appear healthy (5386 in total, with the top papers 732, 506, 242, 189, 178 and a further ten papers >100); I don't think the wider discussion of AfD is unwarranted even if it turns out I'm the lone soul opposing deletion. Will look into it a bit further on the morrow. Espresso Addict (talk) 06:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very few of these papers have anything like 150 coauthors; they are mostly in the range of ~12–20. Ignoring those with >=10 coauthors, the top papers seem to be 732, 189 (1st author), 120, 110, 72. Several of those I've omitted, Sefkow was placed third, which at least in fields I know would be one of the major contributors (1st, 2nd, 3rd, last). There's also the award, which I'd say was more early to mid (under 42 years) than early career. I'm coming down on neutral; I don't feel an urgency to delete, but I'm willing to go with the flow. It would be good to hear from the article creator, Debrah Minkoff. Espresso Addict (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In a field where some of his highly-cited publications have 150 coauthors, we cannot set much store on h-index and citation counts of all publications. This sort of pattern of publication immediately gives most researchers publications with high citation counts, and the h-index is merely an indicator of longevity, not of being a leader. It is too indiscriminate and I don't think the standard should merely be that all high-energy physicists are notable. Alternatives are to look for notable awards and society fellowships, distinguished and named professorships, or heavily-cited first-author papers. His "Design of magnetized liner inertial fusion experiments using the Z facility" is first-author and has triple-digit citations, but it's the only one. He is an assistant professor so WP:PROF#C5 is out of reach. There is a 2017 reference for two awards [31], but one is really just a startup grant (not a prize or medal) and the other is also an early-career award [32]. I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New Jersey and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:56, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hedwig Tusar-Taxis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NBIO. She has achieved nothing in her life, so she does not deserve own encyclopedic entry. Being married to a notable person does not make her a notable person. FromCzech (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is not inherited. Article composed of various original research and does not demonstrate any notable achievements of the subject. C 679 08:32, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to her first, notable, husband Vlastimil Tusar. PamD 09:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per PamD. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is significant coverage of her in two sources that are included in the article, one as Further reading [33], pages 375-376, and one in External links [34] (which is unfortunately not the actual article, but announces a "New series: Wives of our Prime Ministers" and says "You can find the full story of Vlastimil Tusar's two women in the magazine Pátek, the Friday supplement of Lidové noviny." I haven't yet tried to find the Friday supplement.) There is also SIGCOV in this article from the National Museum in Prague [35]. These sources are from 2004, 2010 and 2011, so she is clearly notable almost 100 years after she married Tusar. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is an other very actual article from December 2024 published in the NÖN and listed as reference in the article on Hedwig Tusar-Taxis: Attempted murder 99 years ago. Bloody Christmas in the Hellerhof Paudorf. --Culturawiki (talk) 11:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per PamD is a good option. I don't understand how the sources listed above support notability. If there is such a thing, add it to the article. But, for example, the one from the National Museum only describes what she wore as the wife of the prime minister. The article in NÖN describes that she witnessed a crime, if I understand correctly. Even if it were WP:SIGCOV, remember that it is not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. FromCzech (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is the case for many wives of heads of state that articles about them focus on what they look like and what they wear (whether they achieve anything themselves or not). The WP article on Brigitte Macron says "Her style of dress at international meetings has often been commented upon." That seems to be what is considered notable about her (and the age difference between her and Macron .....) - and gets written about. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:18, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, no consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Lynch (mining engineer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only indepth coverage I could of him was his unfortunate death. Take away that and his career was unremarkable. So WP:BLP1E applies here. LibStar (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Australia. LibStar (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gamble Hill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this due to being unable to find any sources discussing this location (only a couple mentioning the adjacent "Gamble Hill Drive" and "Gamble Hill Croft"). Another user expressed scepticism towards the completeness of my searching, noting that they found the location on Google Maps. I am listing it at AfD to see if anyone can find any sources that would establish notability. — Anonymous 03:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and England. — Anonymous 03:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Created more than a decade ago. Only three sentences total. No sourcing at all. — Maile (talk) 04:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The best that I can turn up are books on the mining industry (e.g. ISBN 9780118843553) that report that the quarry that you see here in Armley (which was a township and an ecclesiastical parish) was a mine into the Elland flagstone, and a couple of 1960s sources breathlessly announcing modernization programmes that report that it was flattened and built over by (subcontractors to) the Leeds Corporation in the 1960s. Uncle G (talk) 09:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bramley, Leeds. There's an image of the Gamble Hill estate in that article. In 19th and 20th century newspaper sources the road Gamble Hill and subsequent developed area of Gamble Hill are usually written as "Gamble Hill, Bramley". It is recognised as a named suburban area by Ordnance Survey in its Open Names database, so could have presumed notability under WP:NPLACE, but as the article is unsourced and there seems little coverage other than mentions, it's probably best redirected for now. Rupples (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The borough and civil parish that contained Bramley and Armley both, back in the time of those 19th century sources, was Leeds, according to White's 1838 History, Gazetteer and Directory of the West-Riding of Yorkshire. So addresses from the 19th century are going to be a little tricky. It doesn't help that Gamble Hill doesn't appear in things like Wilson's 1860 Our Village: A Sketch of the History and Progress of Bramley During Seven Centuries. Here's what one book says, by the way:
  A substantial area of land immediately to the east of Hough End Tannery, between Old Farnley and Bramley, Leeds, was investigated by the then Leeds Corporation for housing in the 1960's.
  — Godwin, C. G. (1984). Mining in the Elland Flags: A Forgotten Yorkshire Industry. BGS reports. H.M. Stationery Office. ISBN 9780118843553. ISSN 0950-9313., p.7
  So it was between towns (as the map confirms) until it was built over. There are notices putting out the development of the "Gamble Hill Housing Estate" for tender in places like the 1957 The Surveyor & Municipal & County Engineer. Seeing a 1962 source that laundry lists all of the individual houses that the initial development contract was for, I have a sinking feeling that one might be able to write something very dull about the housing estate. But let it be in the Bramley article, I think.
  One of the breathless announcements is the fairly obviously rehashed press-release titled "Leeds Road Contracts for Hargreaves" in the 1966 Roads and Road Construction, for the record.
  Uncle G (talk) 14:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bramley, Leeds, per Rupples. I did a quick search when this was still a prod and didn't find anything signficant enough to support an article but it definitely is a historical settlement. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:23, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Newspapers.com has some hits for "Gamble Hill"; the ones I looked at have variations on "Gamble-hill, Bramley, near Leeds" in the late 19th C. Espresso Addict (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: it can't be redirected to Bramley, Leeds because that article does not mention it except in one image caption. Googling (hoping to add a sourced mention of it to the Bramley article), all I can find in the first few pages is a census report which treats "Gamble Hill" as a street name, equivalent to "Henconner Lane". If someone later adds content about it to the Bramley article, then the redirect can be re-created. There is no sourced content here to merge. PamD 12:40, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. For what it's worth: Talk:Gamble Hill#Objection to Prod of 5 February 2025. Thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 21:55, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Ordinarily, I would redirect this article but now there are objections to redirection so we need more discussion or someone needs to add a mention of this article to Bramley, Leeds
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Center, Jay County, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Once again the evidence for this being a "village" is Baker's say-so, and he has proven to be a weak reed. There is a cemetery, because there is a church, and that is what is there now. I expected searching to be mostly fruitless and so it mostly was, and in particular I didn't turn up a handy county history. But I did turn up this account of the founding of this church (which is very handsome on the outside, BTW) which turns out to have been United Brethren, at least when it was started; the largest portion of the UB church was eventually folded into the UMC, and in any case I could not tell whether the church is still in use. Anyway, what's particularly interesting about the account is that while it indicates that there was once a schoolhouse at the location, it rather conspicuously says nothing about a town. This proves nothing of course, but I would remind newcomers that a schoolhouse is not proof of a town either. That's basically all I found; possibly someone can find out more. Mangoe (talk) 03:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are two county histories, Montgomery 1864 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFMontgomery1864 (help) and Jay 1922 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFJay1922 (help), the latter incorporating the former. Both have the school and the church, but no village nor town. Nor is there a Center in Jay county listed amongst the 23 entries for Centre in Indiana alone in the 1902 Lippincott's. Uncle G (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Montgomery, M. W. (1864). History of Jay County, Indiana. Chicago: Church, Goodman, & Cushing. (History of Jay County, Indiana at the Internet Archive)
- Jay, Milton T. (1922). History of Jay County, Indiana: Including Its World War Record and Incorporating the Montgomery History. Historical Publishing Company. OCLC 607766443. (History of Jay County, Indiana: Including Its World War Record and Incorporating the Montgomery History at the HathiTrust Digital Library)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ADInstruments

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources are routine coverage or directory listings. Deleted by PROD in 2006. Jfire (talk) 01:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Biology, Technology, and New Zealand. Jfire (talk) 01:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This one's borderline but I'm leaning Keep. This source from the University of North Carolina at Pembroke discusses the use of ADInstruments products in their biology coursework, and this article from the Otago Daily Times is over the line for significant coverage. It's not ideal, but it is sufficient. HyperAccelerated (talk) 21:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Penza Oblast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Draftified by @Significa liberdade:, reverted by creator. Couldn't find any sources talking about the flag. Can be redirected to Penza Oblast. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Flags of the federal subjects of Russia#48 oblasts. There might be a more relevant article to redirect to given I'm not familiar with this section of Wiki, in which case I would support that as well. I couldn't find much about the subject aside from user-generated vexillology Web sites and a couple of non-SIGCOV passing mentions in books that mostly talk about the oblast rather than the flag itself. Flags are not notable just because they exist, and there isn't anything substantive to form an article from here. I would also note that most of the articles in this topic are in a similarly poor condition. Billclinton1996 (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

India-West

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable newspaper. No WP:SIGCOV and fails WP:GNG. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: lack of significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 08:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: I went ahead and added citations addressing @Bunnypranav's WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG concerns, as well as WP:NEWSNOTE more generally. The citations include awards from ethnic media organizations, the paper's interviews with heads of state, being the subject of dissertations, being frequently cited by academics, etc. I hope this addresses any remaining concerns. Anirvan (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WZRO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure how to propose this, but feel like this (and all other defunct radio station) nomination(s) should be procedurally closed for not being grouped together properly. While some may be notable, and others could be re-directed to respective state articles at List of radio stations in state#Defunct stations per User:RadioKAOS's comment on the KAQU-LP nom, it'll be impossible to adequately access the noteworthyness of 100+ similar article nominated at one time like this. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- My above comment not withstanding, this article could be redirected to List of radio stations in Florida#Defunct per precedent. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WZFI-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WYPH-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WYLI-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG and no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 08:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXZR-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG and no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 08:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXXD-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXRE-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG and no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 08:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXND-LP (New Hampshire)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXLJ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXDB-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WXBH-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WWPZ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WWJL-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM with zreo sources. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WWGH-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WWFC-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WWBW-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WVVW-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. The stations WVVP-LP and WMBP-LP should also be deleted. Chuterix (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ohio and West Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WVOO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WVFP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WVBL-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WUAC-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WTLL-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WTHA-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WSVV-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WSUV-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WSPE-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WSHP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WSCM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WRZC-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WRRW-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WQXD-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WQOS-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WQNH-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WQMR-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WQFR-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WPVC-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WPCU-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WORZ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WORJ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WOMM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. No sources. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WNYL-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WNRG-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that likely fails WP:GNG; only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WNMI-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and South Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WNLN-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WMBC-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WLBJ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WKOC-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WKMZ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WKJV-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WKJO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WKJH-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WKHP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WJZF-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. No sources. Chuterix (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WJWC-LP (Alabama)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG; only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WJRX-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WHRR-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WHMZ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WHLE-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WHCK-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roland L. Bragg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This will be controversial. Bragg was a non-notable soldier until 2 days ago, when he was used to justify the renaming of Fort Liberty back to Fort Bragg. He was not and is not independently notable except for that WP:1E. The page should be deleted and relevant information covered at Fort Bragg#Renaming to Fort Bragg or a separate page should be created about the naming and renaming of Fort Bragg Mztourist (talk) 03:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 03:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Bragg clearly has WP:SIGCOV. Additionally, WP:ANYBIO states that the recipient of "a well-known and significant award or honor" makes one eligible. Having one of the largest military installations in the world named after you surely qualifies. Furthermore, Bragg does have coverage in newspapers and a book outside of and preceding the fort surrounding the ambulance incident; therefore WP:1E does not apply. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Having a base (or a ship) named after you does not satisfy WP:ANYBIO#1 which refers to awards like the Medal of Honor. The ambulance incident wasn't notable 2 days ago. Mztourist (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ANYBIO does not say that it is only referring to awards or honors like the Medal of Honor. Do you have precedent for this view? Moreover, of course the ambulance incident is notable. It was covered in multiple newspapers and in a book. Just because it hadn't been covered until today doesn't mean that it wasn't notable. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk •{{nbsp}Contribs} 05:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have never seen any determination that having a base named after you satisfies WP:ANYBIO#1, but there is precedent that having a ship named after a person does not make that person independently notable, see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 159#having a military ship named after you proves notability. To my knowledge a discussion of base names has not occurrred, presumably because bases are usually named after notable people (Generals, MoH awardees etc.) and not just people who conveniently have the same surname as a Confederate general. Mztourist (talk) 05:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Now that Fort Bragg is named after him, he has widespread coverage in reliable sources. And there is The Bitter Woods. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Maine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: DMVHistorian (talk) 04:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please advise your policy based argument. Mztourist (talk) 04:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the thoughtful discourse on this topic. However, to me, Bragg is certainly eligible under WP:ANYBIO at this point. I would concur with others that having one of the largest bases in the world named after a subject would be considered an honor befitting a "well-known and significant award or honor." If there is a more robust definition of how Wikipedia defines "significant honor" that does not include a military installation, I would be interested to see it. Additionally, the assertion that Bragg was not notable in any way prior to this week is discounting that he received prior recognition including the Silver Star for his brave exploits during the Battle of the Bulge, which were notable enough for John Eisenhower to include in his 1969 book on the subject, which was listed as a bestseller in The New York Times, Publisher's Weekly, and TIME magazine. It is safe to say that many readers across the United States learned Roland Bragg's name then, just as readers are re-learning his name today. His story of bravery was not merely told this week for the first time - it was featured in various newspapers across the United States and in at least one magazine going as far back as thirty years ago and most recently in 2016. Lastly - As of writing this, this article has reached over 86 thousand views in the past day. The median article on Wikipedia gets about one page view per week, or an average of 52 views per year (WP:VIEWSSTATS). In my view, it is clear that the readers of this encyclopedia are interested and earnest to learn more about this notable American hero, and I personally think we should give them the great privilege to do so. Thank you all for your time. DMVHistorian (talk) 04:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Silver Star is the 3rd-highest military decoration for valor in combat, it is never enough to satisfy WP:ANYBIO#1. Of course the page has high views, Hegseth chose him because he shares Braxton Bragg's surname, pure WP:1E Mztourist (talk) 05:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC) I've read extensively about the Battle of the Bulge, visited the battlefield and museums several times and have never heard about the ambulance incident until reading Bragg's page. It isn't even mentioned on the Battle of the Bulge page. I don't have Eisenhower's book, how much of it is devoted to Bragg? A chapter? A page? A paragraph? Mztourist (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A reasonable AfD nomination by the OP and I had to marinate on this for a bit, but ultimately landed on barely a Keep (but not a Weak Keep), as the subject is notable for two independent incidents, each of which is separately chronicled and each by multiple RS: the ambulance incident (which was reported three times: in a 2016 article by Reunions Magazine, in the 1969 Eisenhower book, and in a 1999 non-paid [staff written] obit in the Portland Press Herald [36]); and, as the namesake of Fort Bragg (which was widely reported by dozens of sources in 2025). If only one of these two points of notability existed, the article would potentially fail WP:BLP1E. Chetsford (talk) 05:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Lots of news articles talking about him plus the book by Eisenhower. Definitely relevant and necessary.Kfein (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Well written and we have articles about obscure footballers with 12 page views every month, so deleting this would be quite hypocritical. Alexysun (talk) 06:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Why would someone try to delete this? I think it would just need to be uploaded again later, if it were deleted. Durindaljb (talk) 07:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, name well never be unstoried. Hyperbolick (talk) 11:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WFJV-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that likely fails WP:GNG; only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 03:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WFCB-LP (New Hampshire)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WFBO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WDLP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WCUA-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WCSQ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WCSE-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WCRX-LP

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that may not meet WP:GNG. Has more details than most LPFMs that I'm batch AfDing. Chuterix (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WCLM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WBUE-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WBSQ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WBLG-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WBFT-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG; no sources. Chuterix (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WBDB-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WAJB-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WACM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KZZF-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KZSO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Schools. Chuterix (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sisters High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much information about the school except for their students. Chuterix (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KZLF-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KYON-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KYAO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KXAL-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KWMV-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KWIR-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KVRY-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KVLP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KVIM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. No sources. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KTPV-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KSBP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KRUU-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Only technical information. Chuterix (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KRLY-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KQPT-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KQEP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KPWH-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KPVN-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KPJN-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KOWA-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KMZG-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KMSJ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KMFO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KLWR-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KLUI-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KLGU-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nail knot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was prodded with the rationale: "Knot techniques don't have any inherently notable qualities. I see that this particular one has been discussed in many blogs, forums, and other user-generated sources, but nothing approaching the quality needed to be used as a reference on Wikipedia." Deprodded because it is "a pretty well-known knot in fishing". That does not address the reason for prodding or explain why it meets GNG (the infamous Battle for Dream Island is presumably also "pretty well-known"). — Anonymous 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — Anonymous 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

as someone who has little idea about knots even after having ilustrated more than 20 of wikipedias knots i have never seen the wikipedia page on individual knots as a "How to" but more as a reference, knots are named diferently in diferent countries and without an image or an explanation how are you suposed to compare them or understand them enough to know two names refer to same knot, when the author says well known, he means to say the name is coloquial and not official (as far as i understand it) and to be fair something not aproaching the level of quality you personaly think is needed for the wikipedia is no reason to remove it , quite the oposite is a reason to complete it and increase it. sometimes knowledge is not deep, and that doesnt make it less useful. i have recieved hundreds of mails over the years thanking me for this knot pages, from people of all corners of life and all corners of the world. Jusdt have a look how many other wikis link to the image to have an idea how many other nationalities consider this knot worthy of inclusion. and if so many people apreciate what they learned from the tiny wikipedia page i think that knowledge has its own value. seems a bit selfish on your part to just want to delete it becouse you think it is "too simple" so i oppose this removal. -LadyofHats (talk) 11:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KKJD-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KKHP-LP

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KJZT-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KJSM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KJRZ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KJRM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KIHP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KHHS-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KGIA-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KGRU-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Religion, and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KFSC-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KEQP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KEAO-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Radio. Chuterix (talk) 03:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KDSH-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KDLP-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KDHE-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KDEF-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:44, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCVE-LP (California)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCSW-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be both WP:NOTABLE and WP:PROMO, this page was attempted to be deleted in 2006, but recieved no votes, but 19 years later, the page is still almost unchanged. It still sounds very promotional, I am surprised it has gone this far without a second nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ロドリゲス恭子 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCSK-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCRJ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Christianity. Chuterix (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCQX-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCOF-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCMJ-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG, no sources. Chuterix (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCJM-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCFL-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KCER-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KBWG-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KAWX-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Christianity, and Arkansas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KAQU-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Alaska. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of radio stations in Alaska#Defunct stations per established precedent. This nomination doesn't help further our purposes of creating a historical record. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KAPY-LP (Port Angeles, Washington)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Chuterix (talk) 03:13, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:53, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KAJI-LP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct LPFM that fails WP:GNG. Chuterix (talk) 03:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Lutheran High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTABLE and possibly WP:PROMO, the only source is promotionary, as are other articles about the school online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ロドリゲス恭子 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Christianity, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Better Photography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability; only significant coverage is press releases/churnalism. "It has won annual awards" is false; it presented the awards that are mentioned. This can be redirected to Network18 Group#Digital and publishing divisions, but there isn't really anything to merge. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Photography, and Maharashtra. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 08:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Demon (1979 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-contradictory article about a film, not properly sourced as having any serious claim to passing WP:NFILM. As written, this is based entirely on directory entries and unreliable sources that aren't support for notability, with absolutely no evidence of substantive WP:GNG-worthy coverage about the film at all, which has left us with significant verifiabilty problems.
The most severe problem here is that the article is disambiguated as "1979" in its title, while its body text, infobox and categories are claiming that it's a 1981 film rather than a 1979 film -- but even the unreliable sources aren't shedding any light on the matter: one says 1979, one says 1981, and one says both 1979 and 1981 in different parts of the same page. Meanwhile, a six-week-old talk page request as to whether an editor with archival access to South African media could determine whether there's any truth to the claim that the film premiered there in 1979 (not currently in the article, but added and removed in the past without sourcing) also came up dry, with the participants only finding more directory entries that not only said both things and evidence that even its IMDB entry had been shifted between 1979 and 1981 in the past, but also added 1980 into the mix.
The page simply can't be left in contradiction with itself anymore -- one way or the other, the title and the body text have to match, and the film isn't sourced anywhere near well enough to overlook our inability to properly verify the actual release date. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and South Africa. Bearcat (talk) 02:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Addressed the date issue (not rare for films that have been renamed and sometimes released in December in SA and January in the US (for example)), I think. Coverage seems enough to judge that this film meets GNG and/or NFILM. -Mushy Yank. 10:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because the year can still seem contradictory, renaming The Demon (Percival Rubens) and change categories accordingly can be done. -Mushy Yank. 10:39, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn‎. missed sources in last AfD (non-admin closure) PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

World Leaders

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass GNG or NBOOK. No sources. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ravencroft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional prison from Marvel/Spiderman verse. Pure plot summary and list of appearances. No reception, analysis, etc. The topic also has a section in Features of Spider-Man media (a problematic article that is currently discussed in its own AfD). I doubt we need even a single mention of this on Wikipedia outside a plot summary in some Spider-Man arc or comic; we certainly don't need two. This could be ATD-R to the mentioned article, but IMHO that one should be deleted as well, so... shrug. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Comics and animation. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Features of Spider-Man media. Though that article is up for AfD right now, the content will likely be merged to another article if merged, or kept around if kept, so I'm comfortable leaving a redirect here. Features of the Marvel Universe is also a decent merge target should that article be kept, but it's a bit up in the air right now given all these AfDs are active at the same time. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect I think we this we should wait with this discussion on the results of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of Spider-Man media and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features of the Marvel Universe, both potential merge targets. Both are covering this topic. But they could benefit from some references here. This ScreenRant article, while not establishing notability, has relevant commentary to show that this topic can be covered beyond just plot-summary and real-world appearances. Daranios (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jihobbyist

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a neologism, and does not meet our standards for it. There is actually a lot of usage of the term, but it's always referring to it in the context of its creator, and should be merged to the creator of the term, Jarret Brachman. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1976 Olympia bombing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find evidence this has independent notability to pass WP:NEVENT. There were a lot of bombings in the Troubles. Unless further coverage exists that proves notability, should be merged to Chronology of Provisional Irish Republican Army actions (1970–1979)#1976 PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Terrorism, and Ireland. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've just added a bunch more detail, plus contemporary news references. It's also significant in that this incident caused the Provisional IRA to temporarily pause their bombing campaign in Britain due to the fallout - Alison ^talk 04:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alison The contemporary news sources don't really help it pass NEVENT. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the fact that the Provos paused their campaign for some time adds to the uniqueness of this particular bombing - Alison ^talk 04:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's currently uncited. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maxim Noskov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG; I did some searching and was not able to find significant coverage in any reliable source Joeykai (talk) 01:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Ice hockey, and Russia. Joeykai (talk) 01:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG and no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 08:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Capital Crime Writers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a search, I couldn't find any sigcov on this. There are some news hits but none that are significant. Some of the writers in this are notable, but the group itself? PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Crime, Organizations, and Canada. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Brownsville crash

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NEVENT. The coverage is not WP:INDEPTH enough to write a satisfactory article, and the coverage is not particularly sustained. Nothing between sentencing and incident, or since. On the balance of things this does not pass our guidelines and there is not enough to write a decent article. This wasn't even intentional, they sentenced him over intoxication manslaughter, so I would oppose merging it to any attack list. We could probably merge it for two sentences to Brownsville, Texas#21st century, because it seems locally significant, but there isn't anything to say besides it happened, no background or aftermath, etc. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, and Texas. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Krokodil (game show)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The significance of the TV show has not been confirmed. The Russian Wikipedia article was deleted repeatedly [37].--Соловьиная Роща (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyas Muminov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of WP:GNG--Соловьиная Роща (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The only source is one game report by the FNL, fails WP:ANYBIO. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 01:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 04:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG and no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 08:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akash Bobba

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability standards, only famous from news WP:BLP1E ${\text{Clyde}}2_{3}^{9}$ (👋 • 🗣 • ✍️) 00:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Engineering, Software, California, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Department of Government Efficiency#Members We should probably do the same for the others as well TNM101 (chat) 04:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Department of Government Efficiency#Members: per above. AgerJoy talk 08:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]